skip navigation

Latest News

  Commercial Arrangement Breaches Lease Terms 
  Landlord Pays Price for Failing to Inform Tenant 
  Moving Target Causes Headache for Contractors 
  Planners Quash Subsidiary Activity 
  Guarantee Clause Not Linked to Assignee 
  Incorrect Service Defeats Service Charge Claim 
  Reliance on Pre-Contract Negotiations Revisited 
  Business Rates - Act Now! 
  Guarantee Wording Benefits Director Guarantor 
  The Duty to Manage Asbestos - HSE Guidance 
More...

Insolvent Landlord - Tenant's Lease Renewal Application Must Be Considered


 

Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA), a tenant normally has the right to renewal of a lease on commercial premises unless the landlord requires occupation of the premises for its own purposes, which may include the purpose of redeveloping the site.

In a recent case, a tenant sought renewal of its lease in the normal way from an insolvent landlord. The application was opposed by the administrator of the insolvent landlord, who wished to buy time so he could put together a scheme for redevelopment that would satisfy the demands of the LTA.

The administrator relied on the Insolvency Act 1986, which provides that ‘a legal process’ cannot be taken against a company in administration without the consent of the administrator or the permission of the court.

The administrator is an official of the court, whose duty is to try to rescue the company as a going concern or, if that is not possible, to achieve a better result for the creditors of the company than would be likely if the company were wound up. If either of these cannot be achieved, then the administrator’s duty is to realise property for distribution to preferential creditors. Accordingly, administrators have considerable power to prevent actions which might ultimately favour one class of creditor against another or be to the detriment of creditors generally.

In this case, the administration was, in effect, for the benefit of the insolvent company’s bank. There was no likelihood that the landlord company could continue as a going concern.

In the view of the court, the tenant’s application for a new lease would not affect the interests of the creditors of the company – of which the tenant was not one – nor could it affect a distribution to the bank. The tenant’s right to have its application to a new lease heard promptly was also in point.

Since the landlord, or its administrator, could not demonstrate that it had in place a scheme for redevelopment of the premises at the date of the hearing of the application for the new lease, that application had to be heard and it was up to the court hearing the application to impose such terms on the lease as were appropriate in the circumstances.


For legal reasons only registered users can add comments

 
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Business Lawyers Ltd, 4 Bridle Gate, High Wycombe, HP11 2JH
Tel: 0845 1306608 Fax: 0870 622 0702

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) | SRA ID: 425867
© Business Lawyers. All rights reserved.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

[smaller] Change text size [larger]