skip navigation

Latest News

  Employee Ordered to Repay £150,000 in Fraud Case 
  Out of Court Settlement in Disability Discrimination Case 
  Court Supports Ex-Director's Right to Start New Business 
  Employment Contract Valid Where Illegality Not Shown 
  TUPE and the Meaning of 'Affected Employees' 
  Compromise Agreements - Claims of Misrepresentation 
  Sickness and Holiday Leave - Update 
  The World Cup - Are You Ready? 
  National Minimum Wage Cheats - Watch Out! 
  Government Strengthens Law on Blacklists 
More...

IR35 update


 

The recent case of Dragon Consultancy Limited v Revenue & Customs Commissioners proves helpful guidance into the ongoing saga of IR35 and whether an individual is self-employed or employed for tax purposes.

The company was a sole employee director business that specialised in IT systems testing. The sole director owned 50% of the shares. The sevrices of the director were provided via the company to agencies and to end users.

The agency concerned-A-had a client relationship with the end user business-C--and provided D's services as a consultancy. In turn the agency had a fixed term contact with Dragon-D. There was no written contract between the director and the company however.

After three exclusive contracts with C of seven,nine and twenty two months the special commissioner agreed with the respondent commissioner's conclusion that D was liable to pay the director's NI contributions and PAYE income tax as if he were an employee.

The conclusion was reached as if the services had been provided between the director and C the director would be regarded as an employee for tax purposes.

In agreeing with the earlier conclusion reference was amde to all the circumstances of the case including the right to provide a substitute worker which had to be agreed by C. A limited right of substitution was comptaible with a relationship fo employment and Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton (1999) was distinguished.

Also of relevance was the issue of supervision which went beyond directing the director when and where to work. It was not expected of a skilled worker that how the work was to be done would be controlled in a consultancy relationship. Regular appraisals and monitoring here would not be expected for a self-employed consultant-though a caveat would need to be added for professionals who are required by their governing bodies to so monitor and supervise.

Of course each case is different and if your own case is of concern then you are advised to have your own bespoke conditions analysed carefully to assess your employment situation.


For legal reasons only registered users can add comments

 
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Business Lawyers Ltd, 4 Bridle Gate, High Wycombe, HP11 2JH
Tel: 0845 1306608 Fax: 0870 622 0702

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) | SRA ID: 425867
© Business Lawyers. All rights reserved.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

[smaller] Change text size [larger]